Clinical decision support
Decision support tools
Guideline-anchored tools that show which published recommendations apply to a given clinical situation. Every recommendation is quoted verbatim from the cited guideline and machine-verified against its full text. These tools surface the evidence, they do not predict outcomes or replace clinical judgment.
Acute Severe UC, modified Truelove-Witts
Does this patient meet the modified Truelove and Witts criteria for acute severe ulcerative colitis right now? Six or more bloody stools a day plus any one systemic-toxicity sign.
Open the tool →IPAA Staging PlannerNew tool
Which IPAA staging approaches remain supported for this patient, and what ASCRS actually says about each.
Open the tool →Montreal Classification of UC: Extent and Severity
Assign Montreal extent (E1–E3) and severity (S0–S3), the phenotype used for prognosis, surveillance planning and research coding.
Open the tool →Practice guidelines and risk calculators
Third-party guidelines and prediction tools relevant to ulcerative colitis, each independently verified against PubMed. These are external documents and tools, linked, not reproduced, and not evidence-gated by this site.
Practice guidelines
- ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Medical Treatment
- ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Surgical Treatment
- Clinical Practice Guideline for the Surgical Management of Ulcerative Colitis
- ACG Clinical Guideline Update: Ulcerative Colitis in Adults
- AGA Living Clinical Practice Guideline on Pharmacological Management of Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis
- British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on inflammatory bowel disease in adults: 2025
- ESPEN guideline on Clinical Nutrition in inflammatory bowel disease
Risk calculators and prediction tools
- Truelove & Witts Severity Index Note: A 1955 classification, not a prediction model. It has never been validated to predict steroid failure or colectomy, and must not be used for that. It contains no endoscopic component. The near-universal ESR-to-CRP substitution rests on guideline convention and a small correlation study, not formal revalidation. Only ONE systemic criterion beyond >=6 bloody stools/day is needed to trigger 'severe', so it is deliberately sensitive, not specific.
- UCEIS (Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity) Note: Best-validated endoscopic index in UC, but inter-observer reliability is only moderate (kappa ~0.50). A one-point disagreement between two competent endoscopists is normal and can flip an ADMIT-ASC band. MDCalc explicitly states no management recommendations are based on UCEIS. The circulating action thresholds (>=4 escalate, >=7 colectomy risk) come from single-centre cohorts and the ADMIT-ASC derivation, not from a trial; do not treat any cut-point as a surgical indication. Reliability paper is PMID 23891974.
- Oxford (Travis) Criteria, day 3 of ASUC Note: EXTERNALLY VALIDATED AND IT FAILED. The famous '85% will need colectomy' figure does not hold today. Independent validation (Dig Dis Sci 2019, PMID 31093812) found only 36% of criteria-positive patients underwent in-hospital colectomy, versus 9.5% of criteria-negative. A 2025 post-biologic cohort (n=261) gave sensitivity 58.6%, specificity 71.9%, AUC 0.65 for steroid non-response, with an in-hospital colectomy rate of just 8%. Derived pre-biologics from 51 episodes in 49 patients at one hospital. Legitimate use: a prompt to escalate and involve surgery. Illegitimate use: quoting 85% to a patient, or treating it as an indication to operate.
- ADMIT-ASC (Admission Model for Intensification of Therapy in Acute Severe Colitis) Note: The best externally validated ASUC tool (Oxford derivation n=131 admissions; independent validation in Australia n=110 and India n=62), but note three limits. (1) It predicts STEROID non-response, not colectomy; do not read it as a colectomy probability. (2) The headline '0 and 4 were 100% predictive' applies to very few patients, most cluster in the indeterminate middle. (3) It requires a UCEIS, so it is unusable if flexible sigmoidoscopy is deferred. No free standalone web calculator exists; the score table is in the Gut paper.
- Le Baut score (1-year colectomy risk after ASUC admission) Note: Derived retrospectively from two French centres (n=270, 2002-2017) and validated in an external cohort by the same group; I found no independent replication by unrelated investigators. The derivation window closed before ustekinumab, JAK inhibitors and S1P modulators reached UC practice, so the 1-year colectomy risk it encodes is very likely an overestimate for a patient treated in 2026. No web calculator; paywalled in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
- Ho Index (Edinburgh score) Note: Derivation cohort was 167 patients at one Edinburgh centre, 1995-2002, entirely pre-biologic. Reported failure rates of 11% / 43% / 85% for scores 0-1 / 2-3 / >=4 have not reproduced in the biologic era. The head-to-head comparison against the Oxford criteria in UK IBD Audit data (PMID 27060985) found neither score performed well enough to govern decisions, and published systematic reviews conclude that none of the day-3 ASUC indices (Oxford, Ho, Lindgren, Seo) is fully validated. Requires a plain abdominal film, which is often not obtained if CT was done instead.
Also on MDCalc
These are established instruments already hosted as free, working calculators by MDCalc. We link them rather than rebuild them. Our own decision-support tools above cover what MDCalc does not, and every link below was verified against MDCalc directly.
- Montreal Classification for IBD Note: A PHENOTYPE classification, not a prediction model. Extent should be recorded as the maximum ever documented, not the most recent endoscopic appearance, which underestimates true extent in quiescent disease.
- Mayo Score / Disease Activity Index (DAI) for Ulcerative Colitis Note: An ACTIVITY index, not a risk model. The endoscopic subscore requires a scope, so the 'partial Mayo' seen in clinic is a different instrument with different thresholds, say which one you mean.
- Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI) Note: PAEDIATRIC ONLY. Do not apply adult Truelove-Witts thresholds to children, or PUCAI to adults.
- Wexner Continence Grading Scale (Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score) Note: The single most-used continence instrument after ileal pouch surgery and the one reported in most IPAA functional-outcome series. Note MDCalc's URL slug says 'obstructed defecation syndrome' but the tool served is the Wexner continence scale.
- Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) Note: Calculated AFTER the operation, so it informs postoperative disposition, never the decision to operate. Not validated specifically in IBD surgery.
Guideline summaries hosted by MDCalc:
- ACG Clinical Guideline: Ulcerative Colitis in Adults (via MDCalc) Note: The underlying ACG 2019 full text stores its comparison operators corrupted in our corpus (the published PDF encodes '>' as '.' and '<' as ','), so quote thresholds from MDCalc's rendering or the journal, never from our stored text.
- ACG: Preventive Care in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (via MDCalc) Note: Directly relevant before starting biologics or immunomodulators, and a frequent gap in surgical clinics.
- AGA: Pharmacological Management of Ulcerative Colitis (via MDCalc) Note: Medical therapy only. It does not address surgical indications or timing.